Two Recent Supreme Court Decisions

Fair warning - rant ahead.  

Today, the United States Supreme Court made gay marriage legal nationwide.  Here's a link to an article.

http://news.yahoo.com/us-supreme-court-rules-gay-marriage-nationwide-141601707.html

Yesterday, the came court issued a ruling about the Affordable Care Act having to do with subsidies.  Here's another link.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/06/25/obamacare-supreme-court-decision_n_7346048.html

I think I'm going to take what may be a somewhat different stance on both these issues: We're missing the fucking point.  I will try to elaborate.  

With regard to gay or same sex marriage, I really don't care.  If two men or two women want to get together and make a common life for themselves, what business is it of mine?  However, marriage stopped being about that a long time ago, didn't it?  It's a legal term. It allows for certain privileges.  Spouses cannot be compelled to testify against each other in court, and when it comes to medical decisions if someone is incapacitated, spouses get to have the final word.  I won't even get into what happens from a legal standpoint with a divorce; that's a whole different discussion.  Suffice it, for now, to say it's fucking crap.  As far as I'm concerned, government should have the same level of interest in marriage that I do; it's none of their business.  Centuries ago, marriages were arranged as a kind of alliance, whether it had to do with war, politics, or social standing.  Love never entered into it.  We'd like to think that's changed, but has it really, from a legal perspective?  Why does it take governmental recognition of any kind to make a marriage official?  And why is it their business on any level if a marriage ends?  

Similarly, why should there be federal subsidies for healthcare?  Why should there be any government involvement at all?  We are supposed to be a capitalistic society; not socialist.  We are supposed to be about individual rights, not taking what one person has earned and using it to benefit another.  I call that theft.  Yes, it's legalized theft; same as any form of tax in my book.  That does not make it morally acceptable for those who prefer freedom over the mommy state.  If we as a society decide that we want universal healthcare, fine.  Let's just do it.  This hybrid model imposed by the Affordable Care Act is unsustainable crap.  Make it a tax - whether income or sales - and just do the fuck away with insurance premiums.  Will it work?  Hell, I don't know.  Some say Canada's healthcare system works; some talk about those citizens coming here for better care.  I'm no expert.  I'm just expressing an opinion.  I think gov't should keep their nose out of healthcare, aside from ensuring ethical practices.  Yes, I know that's a whole separate issue.  Right now, I'm talking about socialized medicine.  How about instead of it being part of our taxes, we make it an optional fund to which we as a people could contribute?  I have no problem with that.  If you truly believe in socialized medicine, then you can take part of your paycheck or bank account and hand it over to the state for administration.  Then people like me who prefer to hold on to fruits of their labor won't be robbed by government.  

So, to come back to my initial statement that we're missing the point - if government and the legal system in general weren't so ingrained in our everyday lives, these issues wouldn't matter.  If marriage was actually about a relationship between two people and not an institution recognized by the government, same sex marriages would already be on equal footing with those between a man and a woman.  If healthcare was about actually caring for people and not turning a profit, subsidies wouldn't matter.  However, some argue that profit is supposed to drive innovation.  You know what else it drives?  Corruption.  In my opinion, healthcare today isn't about curing disease; it's about long term medications or care.  We aren't patients, we're fucking customers.  

But...I got a bit sidetracked there, didn't I?  

I still say we as a society are missing the point.  With same sex marriage, I was pretty clear.  With Obamacare and government subsidies, we are already taking what someone has earned and using it to benefit someone else, and we're doing it in a way that's a clusterfuck and is adding to a national debt that is already at level that will never be repaid.  Maybe we're on the road to going one way or the other with it.  We should just get there already.  

I'm aware that I may be oversimplifying these issues, particularly healthcare.  But, this is my website and my blog, and these are my opinions, which are subject to change.  'nuff said.

Comments

June 30, 2015 @08:01 pm
Marriage is a legal contract. That is why the government is involved. It defines what constitutes a marriage. It was beyond time that the old standard of one man/one woman was abolished and, in my opinion, just apply to two individuals. The legality of marriage applies to the topics you brought up as well as protecting a spouse from another person claiming to be a spouse of a deceased person and laying claim to any estate. It also keeps people from claiming marriage to their pets or inanimate objects to exploit benefits of their employment. While I will admit, many people have had more loyal pets than spouses, should they enjoy the same rights with regard to their care as they do with a spouse? Medical leave if they have puppies? Bereavement pay for a broken down car? As you so eloquently put it, people are fucking stupid. They will exploit any and everything. Yes, it sucks that a government entity has to be involved in such an intimate way. But it is necessary. As for healthcare, I suppose I am somewhat apathetic. It stems from having decent healthcare and not having to think about it. To me, part of my wages have been supporting others' healthcare since I started earning so I just feel that it is beyond time people stepped up and paid their own way. However, I don't agree with forcing the people of the US to purchase healthcare anymore than I like being forced to pay for them. I don't mind paying taxes for services that benefit me. I like driving on good roads and having the services of a strong military and police/fire fighters. I don't mind helping the elderly. I don't mind helping people who want to help themselves. But I live in a place where people without jobs don't want jobs. They are smart enough to figure out how to get all the assistance they can without doing much more than taking their card to the machine each month to collect their "benefits". Again, exploitation. I can equate being a patient with being a customer. But I don't consider that a bad thing. As a patient, I shop around for procedures. An example is my sister needed an MRI. The local hospital charged $1100.00. She spoke with our sister in law, a physician's assistant, who recommended an MRI facility. They only charged $400.00. Now, I wouldn't go searching for a low-ball price for LASIK or a surgical procedure. A doctor's office is a business operation with employees that need to be paid and continually trained to provide me with the best service. But, we have to face the fact that again, people expect too much. So many people expect a pill to fix them when a lot of times, an ounce of prevention IS worth a pound of cure. Everything in life doesn't require medication. You may think me narrow minded for taking this stance. In some ways, I am. I am just over the fact that nobody wants to take any accountability for anything in life. I fear I am straying way off topic here so, I will wrap it up. I've always enjoyed your discourse. Keep offering it up. Lezlie

Leave a comment:

Tip Jar

Booking

For bookings, please use this email address:

booking@toddlorenz.com

 

Social Stuff

Want to be on my mailing list?

I promise to only share stuff I think is important and I will keep your info private.

Facebook Feed

Todd Lorenz on Facebook